If you read the law, it says we can get rid of the student loans in bankruptcy if we can show “undue hardship.”
“Undue hardship” doesn’t sound so bad. It is. What most bankruptcy judges take that to mean is there is absolutely no hope that you will ever make enough money to pay anything toward the student loans. “Certainty of hopelessness” is what they want to see.
As long as you are young and in good health, you can’t prove undue hardship. Meaning you can’t get rid of student loans.
My recommendation, which I don’t like, is to put people into a Chapter 13 payment plan where you make a small to the bankruptcy court for five years. The court sends that payment to the student loans. At the end of the five years the student loans are still there–bigger than ever–and you do it again.
Maybe do that three or four or five times until we can get to the point where we can tell the judge there’s no hope of you making enough to pay much of anything and you have been paying under court supervision for fifteen or twenty years.
At that point you should win, although plan B is another five year Chapter 13. Have I said I don’t like this? I don’t like it. But especially for people with large “private” student loans, it can be your only hope of having a normal life. (I like this a lot better for a married couple where only one has the student loan, so the other can do things like finance a car.)
(Michelle Singletary, consumer finance advisor, had a good article about this problem in the April 20, 2010 Washington Post. She didn’t have any solution though.)
Before October 2005, the only government guaranteed and charitable student loans survived a bankruptcy. Private student loans were like any other debt. I can see no good reason why Congress changed the law, but I do see a political reason: Rep. John Boehner, Republican Leader in the House of Representatives, always raises a lot of money from the student loan lenders–and passes it around to other Republicans.
These private student loans have a much higher interest rate than the government guaranteed student loans; and they do not offer the income sensitive payment plans that the government guaranteed loans do. If you get behind with them, they can wreck your life. Thanks, Congressman Boehner.
PS A few bankruptcy judges have lightened up on the undue hardship requirement. That requirement goes back to a Ms Brunner, who tried to get rid of her student loans just one year after she finished grad school. You can imagine the courts were not real sympathetic to her.
Especially because back in 1985, bankruptcy could get rid of your student loans like any other debt, if you had been in payment status for five years. So you only needed to show that “certainty of hopelessness” is you wanted to use bankruptcy to get out of student loans in the first five years.
The five year rule is long gone, student loans are NEVER like a regular debt. But for most judges the “certainty of hopelessness” is still what you have to show.
Some judges are looking at that again, and saying an easier rule should apply now. The New York Times wrote about those judges, here.
PPS President Obama tried to change the Department of Education policy on student loans. The Department to Education uses “loan servicers” to collect the student loans. (Navient and Fedloan Servicing are the one I see the most.) Those servicers are the people who come to the bankruptcy court and argue, when people try to prove “undue hardship” to the Judge. If nobody’s there arguing, then undue hardship should be easier to prove.
The Obama White House asked The Department of Education to come up with a new policy. Didn’t work.
Department of Education came back with new instructions. Same as the old instructions. They told the loan servicers to keep fighting the undue hardship cases. The exact opposite of what the White House–and the bankruptcy lawyers–and you, probably–wanted.
UPDATE The Washington Post had a good article in August 2015, on the government’s income-driven repayment plans.
MORE If bankruptcy can’t get you out of student loans, can the student loans at least get you approved for bankruptcy on your other debts? This case shows the few courts that have decided that, either way. IRM 18.104.22.168 lists student loans as a necessary expense–if Federal and being paid. (Before 11/17/2014 it referred to student loans “secured” by the Federal government. Now it says, guaranteed by the federal government. Since the bankrutpcy law is supposed to follow the IRS, that change should means something, but it’s not clear what. The problem is in 707(b)(2)(A)(ii) “Notwithstanding any other provision of this clause, the monthly expenses of the debtor shall not include any payments for debts.”
UPDATE The Washington Post has a good article about how the student loans collection agencies are allowed to garnish you, without first going to court.
UPDATE The Consumer Finance Protection Bureau has a lot of good info on student loans. Their page on the Obama Public Service student loan forgiveness program is the best I’ve seen anywhere. You can see it here. They estimate that 25% of Americans work in occupations eligible for that program; and they think most don’t know it. I’ve talked to a lot of people who don’t know they are eligible.
UPDATE: This morning, heard a talk by Hon. Stephen St John, Chief Judge of the Bankruptcy Court here. He said, until the Supreme Court does something about it, the door to getting your student loans discharged in bankruptcy is “nailed shut.” You might consider moving to another part of the country, but here in the 4th Circuit it is impossible to win on a student loan case.
UPDATE: The College Republican Federation of Virginia (I was state chairman of that group, more than 40 years ago) posted this “Valentine.” Apparently it was first published February 2016 by the College Republican National Committee.
UPDATE: Eugene Wedoff, a retired bankruptcy judge, took over the appeal, pro bono, of a Ms Conniff on a student loan in bankruptcy. Ms Conniff is a school teacher in a poor county in Alabama; she has advanced degrees but has not been able to move into a position where the advanced degrees would mean more money; she has two children at home, and gets $500 a month in child support.
The bankruptcy court allowed her to get rid of the student loans in her bankruptcy, saying it was obvious she couldn’t pay them. EMC appealed and the US District Court applied the “certainty of hopelessness” rule, and overruled the bankruptcy court. Judge Wedoff, who is now Ms Conniff’s lawyer, was one of the best known bankruptcy judges in the country. He has taken it to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. We’re hoping the Court of Appeals listens to him, and other judges start to lighten up on this, a little.
You can read what Judge Wedoff said, here. appellants-brief-alexandra-elizabeth-conniff-wedoff
UPDATE: May 2017, Congressman John Delaney (D-MD) and Congressman John Katco (R-NY) introduced a bill to allow student loans to be eliminated in bankruptcy, just like any other debts. Their bill is H.R. 2366. This is an important first step.
UPDATE: June 2017. Bankruptcy Judge in Pennsylvania opens the door a little. He says it’s not necessary to show you can NEVER afford to pay the student loans—forever is a long time. Just that you can’t afford to pay for a “significant portion” of the repayment period on the loan. The student borrower in this case, Ms Price, was divorced with three small children. The judge said it didn’t matter that maybe when the kids were grown she’d make enough money to start to pay. Can’t pay now, can’t pay any time soon, and that’s all she needed to prove.